Channel 4 News forced to backtrack after naming wrong suspect in London terror attacks
Abu Izzadeen's brother called up Channel 4 to point out that the attacker they had named is currently in prison
Published:
Channel 4 News has been forced to backtrack after mistakenly identifying the Westminster terrorist during a live broadcast – despite the fact that the man they named is currently serving a sentence in prison and could not possibly have been the attacker.
Senior home affairs correspondent Simon Israel told viewers that the name of the man who killed a police officer and two civilians yesterday was believed to be Abu Izzadeen, formerly known as Trevor Brooks.
But during the broadcast Izzadeen’s brother called in to Channel 4 News to clarify that he was behind bars for an unrelated matter. Andrew Neil also reported that Izzadeen’s solicitor said he was currently in prison.
Well, how does Channel 4 News square this: Trevor Brooks aka Abu Izzadeen's solicitor says he's still in jail!!
— Andrew Neil (@afneil) March 22, 2017
The source I trusted, but ultimately I made a mistake. This time I got it wrong. Abu Izzadeen is in prison.
— simon israel (@simonisrael) March 22, 2017
Channel 4 said in a statement: “On tonight’s Channel 4 News, senior home affairs correspondent Simon Israel quoted a source as saying that the name of the Westminster attacker was believed to be Abu Izzadeen, formerly known as Trevor Brooks.
“During the course of the programme, conflicting information came to light. Channel 4 News is currently looking into this.”
The programme’s editor, Ben de Pear also tweeted, stating that “trusted correspondent” Israel has “rarely been wrong; tonight he was”.
1/2 Tonight our trusted Correspondent @simonisrael made a mistake in naming the wrong person as the suspect in the parliament attack.
— Ben de Pear (@bendepear) March 22, 2017
2/2 in years of award winning coverage @simonisrael has rarely been wrong; tonight he was. Abu Izzadeen is in prison & not the suspect
— Ben de Pear (@bendepear) March 22, 2017
An Ofcom spokesman said the watchdog had received a complaint about the incident and would assess the complaint before deciding whether or not to investigate.
