BLOGS
Proud to be British
- Posted at 2:41pm
- 08 February 2008
- by AndrewCollins-RT
At this week's Baftas, The Bourne Ultimatum could win the award for best British film, even though it's made with American dollars, produced by Americans, stars an American as an American CIA assassin, and is based on an American book by an American author. It's eligible because its director, Paul Greengrass, and other "key creatives" are British.
Much as I love the film, this looks like a technicality too far. Bourne certainly doesn't feel British in the same way as the other nominees: Atonement's wartime reserve, Control's gloomy northern backdrop and This Is England's suburban skinheads. Even the Russian mafia-themed Eastern Promises is set entirely in London. Jason Bourne simply passes through Waterloo Station.
It's an ongoing juggling act. Here at Radio Times, we go by the nationality of the production companies. At Bafta between 1968 and 1982, no distinction was made between British and non-British film; the Academy handed out just one award for best film, and the likes of Women in Love and Kes had to tough it out with the rest of the world. In 1983, they brought in an award for best foreign language film, but our output still had the best of Hollywood to contend with. Indeed, during the golden years of US cinema in the 1970s, British films barely got a look-in.
Thankfully, someone saw sense at the 1993 Baftas and the Alexander Korda Award for best British film was minted. Yet confusion still reigns. In 1995, bunting was unfurled when ultra-British Four Weddings and a Funeral won best film, beating the likes of Pulp Fiction and Forrest Gump. But it wasn't even nominated for best British film. Then, in 1998, when the best film was once again British The Full Monty it was somehow judged not to be the best British film, which went to Nil by Mouth. It seems you can be the best film, but not necessarily the best British film!
Anyway, just sit back and think of England. And Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Mind you, I still can't understand why the director of the best film doesn't automatically win best director.
Post a comment
More
CHOOSE BLOG
LATEST POSTS
-
- Gordon Ramsay's F Word
- Fri 20 November 2009, 4:05pm
-
- Camilla quits I'm a Celebrity
- Wed 18 November 2009, 12:54pm
-
- The X Factor: week thirteen
- Mon 16 November 2009, 1:30pm
-
- Strictly Come Dancing: week nine
- Mon 16 November 2009, 12:32pm
-
- Bruce to miss Strictly because of illness
- Fri 13 November 2009, 11:40am
LATEST COMMENTS
-
- Martina Cole's The Take
- "FAO suzanne - We're told that…"
- Fri 20 November 2009, 6:20pm
-
- The week in soapland
- "Has the wholly bizarre grandmother…"
- Fri 20 November 2009, 6:06pm
-
- Why I Hate...Spooks
- "Come on, Danger Man, Avengers, Man…"
- Fri 20 November 2009, 5:44pm
BLOGS ARCHIVE
ADVERTISER LINKS