Thursday 04 December

BLOGS

blogCategory

Why I Hate…Relocation, Relocation

Phil Spencer and Kirstie Allsopp
  • Posted at 4:43pm
  • 07 February 2008
  • by MichaelHodges-RT
  • 22 comments

Location, Location, Location is a programme based on greed and sex. Greed is provided simply by bringing the housing market to the screen and suggesting that not only could we "trade up", but also we would be better, happier people for it. Sex, less successfully perhaps, is provided by the intimation that, given the chance, Phil and Kirstie would be at it like knives.

The show's bast*rd offspring Relocation, Relocation has taken this model and gone global - well, over the Channel, anyway. Now it's not just about being greedy in Britain, it's about being greedy in Europe at the same time.

Last week we had a couple looking for a place in the Languedoc region which, we were reminded, is in the south of France, plus "a rural idyll" in Suffolk (personally I'd take Montpelier over Felixstowe - generally the wine's better). This is classic Relocation, Relocation, though frankly it doesn't matter what the couple are looking for as the same clunking mechanism is employed every time.

Early on in proceedings false oppositions are set up between the couple: he wants a place where he can extend the garage to house his traction engine, she wants to knock down the kitchen wall and put in a six-burner stove with spit. She wants a view "with trees in it"; he wants to be "near the off-licence".

These rival desires are maintained through the viewing of a succession of increasingly dismal houses with horrendous wallpaper and urine-stained carpet in the toilet. Meanwhile Kirstie is in the Dordogne or Tuscany, looking stern in front of a derelict 18th-century chapel full of diseased goats that has "real investment potential".

But hang on - look what Phil, who'll be wearing a city business shirt combined with jumper and jeans (you know, he's good on the money stuff but he's a nice guy to have a pint with), has found! A semi-detached late Victorian conversion with half an acre of land behind Threshers with a withered apple tree next door.

Phil, unsurprisingly, has done this using his "contacts". Simultaneously Kirstie has gone off to have girlie talks with the unfortunate, and invariably mousey, woman who married the idiot who likes traction engines. But, of course, it can never be truly "girlie" as Kirstie is practically an aristocrat and - high heels, woolly stockings, glum face and blowsy blouses - clearly bewildered by just how common Britons are.

Throughout this tosh Phil and Kirstie have little love scenes under trees or by rivers. This is all so false and so utterly couple-orientated that the single man, or woman, is entirely justified in hurling glass ashtrays at the TV screen. Which I have had to stop, having running out of ashtrays and TV screens.

Buying a house is a hellish experience. Why would anyone choose to do it with a slightly bonkers member of the upper classes and a property speculator? Well, I suppose Unity Mitford and Caligula are dead. Pity though, that would have been good TV.

Comments

  • Posted on 14 October 2008
  • at 7:29am
  • by Su Hughes

I love Kirstie and Phil. It is my favourite show on Foxtell. I want to retire back to Britain after living in Australia. There is so much good advice on locations, prices and personal tastes. It has taken the fear factor out of returning to Britain after 38 years in Australia. I also think that Kirsie and Phil are very stylish, and very funny (the British sense of humour). Miss the sense of humour! Keep sending Relocation to Oz. Many thanks. Su.


  • Posted on 17 August 2008
  • at 7:02pm
  • by pinkie

Ah bagpuss69, don't you like to see people who have worked their fingers to the bone,getting on in life? they should be admired for it, some people hate seeing others doing well,I could never feel like that!! after all the sort of people on this prog, are just hard working people on the whole,you can tell they were not born with a silver spoon in their mouth!! as they all have the same old sayings ticked all the boxes, Wow & so on,they can only be normal working class!!


  • Posted on 17 August 2008
  • at 6:49pm
  • by Pinkie

Well,zangelzone these properties are not all for the well off as you seem to think, they range for very cheap homes from £150K up to around £800k, the price depends on what or where you are looking & what you can afford, I think it is a great prog, only problem is it is quite out of date!!some of the people drive me nuts, with their ticking the boxes & wow's such bores!!


  • Posted on 15 April 2008
  • at 4:59pm
  • by zangelzone
I hate the programme (can't stop watching it though) and I AM completely and utterly, middleclass! Nothing to do with class but with money and greed and ostentatious consumption surely. I have envy too as I can't afford more than a little house - but I'm grateful I'm not homeless. I hate the rich who then have pushed up prices all over the UK with their second homes - tax them out of the market I say, until everyone has at least one home. I can't go back to where I was born now I'm nearing retirement as it's a holiday area of second homes, with the local communities ruined by all those empty properties occupied for only a few weeks a year. I contacted Phil's company once during Location times, to see if they'd find me a house I could afford but was turned down as I didn't have £250 to spend!! Argh!! I'd like to challenge them to do a series with ordinary people - single, older, with low incomes - and find them houses. Do some real work instead of the same old tired easy formula of looking for houses for people with the means and the finances to find them themselves. And why, in an epedemic of rising singleness, are they all couples, gay or straight?

  • Posted on 02 April 2008
  • at 12:47am
  • by albie

I have to agree with Michael. For the first minute my greedy aspirations of grandieur are let loose and I magine I can own a delightful property here or overseas in some wonderful location and then I come back to reality and dreary wet and windy england and only a mountain, of debt.

It leaves me completely stressed out and sick to see what I am missing out on.. oh yes envy , it brings that out in me as well.


  • Posted on 28 March 2008
  • at 3:47pm
  • by Cityrover

I think that their annual spin off programme "Best/Worst Place to Live" is cheap, nasty broadcasting at its worst. The two of them must be so proud of sneering at and ridiculing some of the most disadvantaged areas of the UK with this destructive programme. The streets of Middlesbrough, Hull and Salford, all areas of post industrial decline, cannot hope to compare favourably with the affluent, leafy hotspots that Kirstie and Phil drool over and promote.

Why don't they offset the damaging publicity the programme inflicts on these towns and cities by volunteering some time and expertise, or even part of their fee, to the various regeneration projects in such areas?

I really can't think why they got involved with such a mean, crass programme. It does them no credit but, no doubt, it is very lucrative for them.


  • Posted on 22 March 2008
  • at 8:17pm
  • by bagpuss69

Personally I love Phil and Kirsty - actually can't help but feel sorry for them with some of the lunatics they have to work with!!!

The thing that really winds me up about Relocation Relocation is that it so rarely goes to plan - Mr and Mrs Annoying inevitably end up scrapping the "crash pad" plan and sink the entire budget into the "rural idyll"!!! Clearly, it's just Location, Location, Location in disguise.

That said, I don't really want to have to watch some monumentally rich couple end up with a £250,000 flat in London along with a £675,000 country retreat - that would REALLY make me sick!!


  • Posted on 19 March 2008
  • at 5:57am
  • by nully

Aren't all these house related programs the same.. I can't afford a house yet I see people on their 2nd, 3rd house just to make some more cash. Programs on the BBC annoy me the most..


  • Posted on 13 March 2008
  • at 5:56pm
  • by hailey

Just a note to "ehwells" who thinks it is "normal" to be working class - you probably haven't noticed, but you working class people are now in a distinct minority. As John Prescott said, "we are all middle class now". Well, maybe not all, there are still some ehwells around. "Awright, ehwells, mate - know warra mean?"


  • Posted on 12 March 2008
  • at 10:05pm
  • by bjmf2106

I love Kirsty and Phil - think they are very entertaining and do a great job. Great programme with a bit of humour! Wish there were more of these, certainly better than those awful game shows.


  • Posted on 12 March 2008
  • at 9:02pm
  • by kelwyn
phil and kirsty are so far up their own a***e's that it hardly leaves time for the programme... what a load of s**t the people that the programme is based around couldnt be futher from the truth,most ordinary people coudnt even come close to the type of middle class twats that the show features,so all in all its all bollocks

  • Posted on 12 March 2008
  • at 1:03pm
  • by campdavid

Having nothing better to do the other week, I counted how many hours of location... type programmes there were on freeview. Total 43 hours! Imagine the fuss if there were that much football! Moderation in all things, I say.


  • Posted on 27 February 2008
  • at 8:22pm
  • by ehwells

Nothing wrong with Location, Location. Which deals with normal couples / familes with normal budgets, wanting normal homes....But this Relocation..with up their ar*e couples from London with a budget of £900,000 for a "crash pad" and want to escape the rat race.... urghhhh it makes my blood boil.......

Phil and Kirsty are great presenters and Location Location is for real people, in real situations and must continue.

But please please stop this prententious crash pad rubbish and put normal, everyday working class folk on the telly!


  • Posted on 20 February 2008
  • at 8:35pm
  • by lizzieloo2

you have completely hit the nail on the head..... and I thought I liked the programme!!!!

did anyone see the dead ringers sketch with the Kirsty character saying 'I wasn't born I was knitted!' haven't been able to take her seriously since!!!


  • Posted on 16 February 2008
  • at 9:34pm
  • by Windsurfer
My hubbie loves the program, he says he likes to look for ideas. So having been forced to watch housey stuff I am slowly getting into it although I found it to be mainly about people with lots of money and not your average joe. Also it's a very southern program but then whats new??! Kirstie is not real, in the clothes sense and Phil just keeps on grinning!

  • Posted on 15 February 2008
  • at 9:13am
  • by redheaven

But surely Hodges of the Times misses the point, this is a programme made by women for women, whith a token metro-sexual alongside comely Kirsty, proving that not all men are b******s, and isn't he lovely, ah bless him with his little knowing wink, nod and smarmy comment.

The sole purpose of the programme is to provide entertainment for the Ladies whilst the Gentleman are out doing something else eg- football, socialising, world domination etc.


  • Posted on 14 February 2008
  • at 2:48pm
  • by clintg

I agree with bigpants. The nosey factor definitely comes into play plus it means I don't have to wander the streets peering inro peoples living rooms and risking arrest. I have become strangely addicted to some of these types of programmmes though not relocation 'cos I really can't abide Kirstie. My favourite is the BBC's To Buy or Not To Buy. Often hosted by the gloriously camp Kristian Digby. Maybe one day I'll attempt a semiotic analysis of what it means to me. Bet y'all can't wait


  • Posted on 13 February 2008
  • at 10:41am
  • by djikeighley

Surely you realise this show is for the girls. We get to nosey around other peoples bathrooms, critique Kirstie's fashion sense and ponder how the hell did that woman give birth to a 24 pound baby.


  • Posted on 12 February 2008
  • at 9:29pm
  • by mstead2

Absolutely spot on. You have described all the reasons why I love it!


  • Posted on 12 February 2008
  • at 8:04pm
  • by Sammi8

Relocation relocation is much better than that alternative A Place in the sun! Now she really is annoying!!


  • Posted on 12 February 2008
  • at 3:03pm
  • by bigpants

Sorry have to disagree with you, I like the programme as it lets me be nosey and see into other peoples houses. While I appreciate Phil and Kirstie do very little work in finding the houses I do like there presentation style.

What i would like to see tho is them fined houses for people on a council estate!


  • Posted on 12 February 2008
  • at 2:39pm
  • by si123
You're spot on there, although I do feel you were a little harsh on the lovely Kirstie!! I could be wrong and don't want to start any divorce proceedings if I am, but haven't Phil and Kirstie already broken their steamy surface tention with a briefly publicised affair?

Post a comment

Do you have something to say about this post? Does it ring true for you or have you got different ideas? Share your thoughts…

Post a comment

(first or nickname only)

Please do not include any personal or personally identifiable information about yourself or others (including email addresses). All information you submit about yourself or others can be viewed by others.

Thank you for your comment

Thank you for your comments. All comments will be looked at by a moderator, however, due to the numbers of comments we receive, we can't promise that all will be posted on the site.

Post another comment

More


Advertisement